The 2020 Census included Middle Easterners as “white”; actual Anglos on track to be minority in five years

The 2020 non-Hispanic white population was 57.8%, including “Lebanese, Egyptians” etc. The Census changed the questions between 2010 and 2020, which expands the definition of “white” to include Lebanese, Egyptians, etc. But these results are worse than you think- read on.

This question change obscured the magnitude of change in the US population of the non-Hispanic white percentage.

The 2010 non-Hispanic white population was 63.7% of US residents, with many middle-easterners categorizing themselves as “some other race” or “other Asian.” The 2020 non-Hispanic white population was 57.8%, including “Lebanese, Egyptians” etc. If we subtract all Middle Easterners from the 2020 results for non-Hispanic whites, then only 54.4% of the US is non-Hispanic non-Middle Eastern whites. That is a shocking drop from the 63.7% of 2010 – it’s a decrease of 8.7 percentage points in 10 years! At that rate of change, Anglos (European non-Hispanic whites who only check one race on census forms) will be a minority in the US in less than 4 years.

On the other hand, it’s likely that most Jews, and some Arabs, categorized themselves as “white” in the 2010 census, so Anglos did not really change 8.7 percentage points between 2010 and 2020. To estimate the rate of change, we’re going to need to subtract Middle Easterners from both censuses. Let’s assume 66% of Jews, 40% of Armenians, and 30% of other Middle Easterners (Arabs), and 20% of Iranians categorized themselves as “white” in 2010. In that case, Anglos dropped from 62% of the US to 54.4% – a 7.6 percentage-point drop, or 0.76 points per year. At that rate, Anglos will be a minority less than 5 years from now: before June 2026. The 2020 Census is supposed to be valid for June 2020.

Immigration is to blame, but we shouldn’t blame all of this on immigration. Mixed marriages are reducing the percentage of US children who are “white.” In 2020, 10% of US residents chose more than one box for race, and this article so far has been about people who only checked one race. So the percentage of people who are Anglo or partly Anglo is several points more than 54.4%. In 2010, only 3% of US residents were categorized as belonging to 2 or more races.

Another issue is the “flight from white.” This means that people who used to categorize themselves as white no longer do so. This has less to do with people like Rachel Dolezal or Elizabeth Warren, and more to do with mixed-race people who no longer call themselves white.

We should worry about the millions who’ve poured over the US/Mexico border since Biden was inaugurated, but that happened after the census.

Let this sink in. Non-Hispanic, non-Middle Eastern whites will be a minority in the US in less than five years at the 2010-2020 rate of change. How will this affect voting patterns? Republicans have won the white vote in every presidential election since the 1960’s. The reason Democrats win is people of color. Our children will eventually be persecuted for their whiteness by the majority unless we split the US and create a federation of red states that’s safe for all races.

Biden and Kamala Harris ignored a new decision of the Supreme Court, the Constitution and the rule of law when they extended a moratorium on evictions from rental property. So they may choose to expand DACA to give tens of millions of people citizenship, and therefore the right to vote in US elections. They can give the right to vote to however many foreigners they think will be enough to cause them to be re-elected, to out-vote any backlash.

The fantasy that people will learn to vote like colonial Americans just by living here is disproven by the fact that “white ethnics” still haven’t assimilated in their voting patterns. Eastern and Southern Europeans still tend to vote Democrat, because their ancestors were mostly on the bottom rung of the class structure of a very class-conscious part of Europe. This is one reason that cities vote so blue: not just the people of color, but also the “white ethnics.” Chicago is a good example of this. The descendants of colonial Americans are already a minority in the US. They are descended from the peoples of northwestern Europe. They are still the majority of most rural areas though. The whites from other parts of Europe were imported to work in factories, and still often live in cities, not the countryside.

Even if immigration were stopped next year, the difference in birth rates makes minority status for Anglos inevitable. Even including “Lebanese, Egyptians, etc”, whites are already a minority of US residents in the Census’ age category of 18 and below, the Census announced last week.

Who wants to be an ethnic minority in their own country, with no homeland in the world? Why did we do this to our kids?

This is one of the most monumental civilizational fails in world history. The rate of inflow of foreigners into the US is orders of magnitude greater than the “invasion” of the German tribes into the Roman Empire, even on a per-capita basis. We failed to pass on our country to the next generation. The US is no longer American.

The only way to prevent the entire continent from being ruled by woke immoral Twitter mobs is to split the US. This is the only way to prevent federal bankruptcy and ruin. This can start with TEXIT or Greater Idaho secession, followed by other red states joining a federation. The Texas Nationalist movement already has hundreds of people collecting signatures on a petition that has the legal power to force a non-binding secession question onto Texas 2022 primary ballots.

10 thoughts on “The 2020 Census included Middle Easterners as “white”; actual Anglos on track to be minority in five years

  1. In the northern half of the contiguous United States people of northwestern European descent still constitute a strong majority. More importantly, in that northern section of America most of the children born each year are of northwest European descent on a state by state basis.

    The sunbelt region of America unfortunately suffers a more grim demographic prognosis as only a slender fraction of children born there each year are White. Prudence therefore dictates we secede where we enjoy demographic strength; we must secede strategically and not indiscriminately. The goal must be to create a geostrategically viable White ethnostate. What land we lose now can always be reconquered later. All this may well require an exercise of collective will to power not seen since 1933, but so what? Since when has the very struggle for existence been for the faint of heart?

  2. Another horrible reminder is the fact that white American children are officially, as of typing this, a minority. 18 and under.

    This occupied country can not be saved. It is to far gone. There is no election, primarying or gerrymandering that can save us. The United States is now rotten to the core. A second American republic is the only way to save our people.

    Thank God for state secessionist movements now slightly making the mainstream. It really is the only white pill.

    But as you said, white Anglos were the ones who have set up customs and cultures of America. In this I do think that some whites, who have, generationally, been here longer, are more tied to the land on a genetic level. (Tracing my ancestry to the early 1600s.) Even among Christian groups, I do not see Catholics, Orthodox, Evangelicals, etc. as equal to Mainline Protestant Americans.

    Unfortunately separating who is truly white, or more white than others, should not be the first thing we do, rather more a of peripheral, once we secede, type of notion. It should be first naming the incompatible groups (liberal, left wing, neocon and centrists) who are in full control of certain states, while moving to more actual conservative, (bare minimum, paleocon or even paleolibertarian) states and getting involved in their communities. Not in the anti-social, cultish way, that many of those federal government “neo-nazi psyops” try and make us out to be, but in the sincere, love of your own people and love of everyone way.

    That can not be stressed enough. It can be hard for some of us to do sometimes. But never hate what others tend to do. It’s simply in their nature. That doesn’t mean to put up with it, just know that it for what is it. I have no hate for anyone. I simply prefer my people not fade away and lose total control of what was once the greatest nation to have ever been. Our people created that, but have lost their way. It is our time to save them from extinction and correct our parents and grandparents failures.

    May God guide us and have mercy on the hedonistic lifestyles our past generations “counterculture.”

    1. Nix, i think you make a lot of good points (as also does Captain Chaos and Jsbz, who are the only commenters so far).

      But i would like to point out that the more multi-cultural we become, the more likely we’ll be able to secede. For example, see Yugoslavia. Multi-cultural India has had secession movements (such as of the Sikhs) from almost the time the British set it up in 1947. So the census report can work in our favor, if it helps us pry ourselves loose from our masters.

      As long as we’ve had an empire our people have suffered, from the 120K strong, young, healthy potential fathers killed in World War I to the latest extended bungle in Central Asia.

      As always, each of us should think about secession a little each day and try to figure out ways to prepare for it, even if it is as simple as avoiding the Big Tech infrastructure in favor of something from Andrew Torba or people like him.

      PS: Red State — did you send out a mail blast for this article? I only now saw it.

      1. Of course Dan. The difference is that Yugoslavia had a Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, etc. the United States only has states. Sure there used to be racial laws on a state by state cases, but federal law now over reaches and demands compliance.

        From the beginning, back in colonial days, the United States was meant for white Protestants loyal to the crown (Plantation Act of 1740.) Up through independence are first independent naturalization act (Naturalization Act of 1790) was for “free white persons of good character” on the national level. It was even taken further in the 1820s-30s when an entire country’s founding (Liberia) was based on sending free blacks back to Africa.

        Unfortunately times have changed. You can point to the “Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965” all the way back to the 14th amendment. America has been radically changed from its original founding intent on citizenship.

        When Yugoslavia broke apart, almost every group had a place to go and call home. The United States does not. There certainly are whiter parts or blacker parts of the country, but the people who live there can’t enforce a racial segregated community. Even Indian reservations aren’t allowed to remove non Indians from their reservations. Until we have an official white designated area of the country, we will continue down towards the path of minority, than down to that of South Africa, than down to that of Rhodesia, a country so hell bent on erasing whites from its history that even the name Rhodesia does not exist anymore.

        Now race isn’t the only thing we should be segregating from. The evils of Marxist thought, perpetuated in the form of modern liberalism (or leftism all together) is the most damaging aspect on the white identity. I don’t have to tell you who is behind that. Just look at anti-apartheid (((white))) South Africans and see where our future lies.

        Unless I read this wrong and you are advocating for accelerationism (which may or may not work) we need a mass exodus of white Americans to carve out a large piece of America and be able to defend it from those who would have different ideas on what should be done with white people.

        I do appreciate your take on my comment. I can only wish the best things happen in your life. May God be with you.

  3. This is why the leftist establishment has worked so hard to stigmatise any skepticism of leftwing immigration policy as unqualified racism.

  4. Patriotism is born of emotional attachment to the country one grows up in. Its not possible for immigrants to possess that quality. This is why immigration is so important to leftists.

  5. It seems like there is some white nationalist sentiment in the comments. My reading of the blog post was that it is describing how demographic change affects voting patterns, but was not making an argument for white nationalism.

    I don’t personally want racial nationalism, and i think an association with white nationalism is likely to doom any efforts at secession. My motivation for secession is cultural and ideological, and I believe that is what most people interested in secession are motivated by.

    1. Hi Jsbz,

      You have a good point, but we want to avoid internecine combat.

      You don’t have to actually be a white nationalist to be denounced as a white supremacist. In fact, you don’t even have to be white to be called a white supremacist: Larry Elder, who is a black candidate for governor in the California gubernatorial recall election this September, has been labelled as a white supremacist by the LA Times.

      I think in terms of messaging we can follow the lead of Daniel Miller, who leads the Texas Nationalist Movement: this is not about white people but about people who want their freedom back, and would like to reassert control of their own future. And he’s telling the literal truth: a Red State America, consisting of Texas and probably one or two dozen other states or parts of states, will certainly be multi-racial, but much more culturally cohesive.

      I think Blue America will fragment, especially if they keep up their foreign wars in the Middle East and elsewhere. Those looking to found ethnostates — such as a Nueva Aztlan or a New Albion — may be able to prise apart something from what remains of Blue America.

      And if Red State America follows stupid policies, like getting involved in distant wars, it will face the same fate. But i think if we have election integrity in Red State America, and can figure out how to keep the media from being owned by a small number of New York families, we’ll do just fine.

    2. I hate to be the one to break this to you, but even John Stuart Mill (The Classical Liberal), believed his political philosophy was viable only within the context of ethnic homogeneity. Meaning it was intended strictly for England and not for export. Clearly he did not believe all peoples the world over are fungible and interchangeable; which is I’m afraid what someone of your mindset would be forced to conclude, if you were absolutely intellectually serious about bringing things to their logical conclusion.

      If Bantus and Chinamen are as racially/genetically capable of carrying on our Western civilization as are pure-blooded Europeans then what does it matter if we are eventually bred out and replaced by them, you may think. But the hard truth of the matter is that they are not, and no intellectually serious and honest person has ever believed that they are.

      We do not seek to deny any other people their place under the sun, we just want our own. Justice and morality in that respect on OUR side, and not the other way around.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *